Lexis Nexis
-
In Trustees for the Time Being of the East London Hebrew Congregation v Galperin and Others [2022] 4 All SA 224 (ECLD), continued occupation of property, despite a notice to vacate following the termination of employment. -
In Rohde v S [2022] 1 All SA 504 (WCC) an apprehension or fear of an adverse order is not the basis for recusal, nor were other grounds relied on by the applicant, individually or cumulatively. -
In Gore NO and Another v Ward and Another [2022] 2 All SA 178 (WCC), liability for loss caused by fraudulent acts committed by company director, the authority of directors to control companies is vested and actual. -
In Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union and Others v AngloGold Ashanti Ltd t/a AngloGold Ashanti and Others 2022 (8) BCLR 907 (CC), substantive requirements for lawful secondary strikes. -
In Mbhamali v S [2022] 1 All SA 488 (KZD), practice of child marriages does not supersede the laws and the Constitution of the country. The fact that a child might have consented to such an act is no defence. -
In Santam Limited, a division of which is Hospitality and Leisure Insurance v Ma-Afrika Hotels (Pty) Ltd and Another [2022] 1 All SA 376 (SCA), business interruption indemnity period, objective approach of interpreting contracts and parties’ intentions applied. -
In Knuttel NO and Others v Bhana and Others [2022] 2 All SA 201 (GJ), whether there is substantial compliance with the requirements for the signing and commissioning of a founding affidavit when done via a WhatsApp video call. -
In Theodosiou and Others v Schindlers Attorneys and Others [2022] 2 All SA 256 (GJ), effect of invalid contingency agreements on underlying settlement agreements and court’s discretion to inquire into the merits thereof. -
In LA Group (Pty) Ltd v Stable Brands (Pty) Ltd and Another [2022] 2 All SA 678 (SCA), challenge against cancellation of trade mark registrations, and the grounds for cancellation. -
In Mwale v Financial Services and Another [2021] 4 All SA 167 (GP), the applicant applied to the Financial Services Tribunal for a reconsideration of the decision of the Authority on the grounds of being unreasonable, irrational; and bias.