Cookies help us to understand you better. Browse on or click to
-
One of the key findings in this year’s LexisNexis SA and the Law Society of South Africa’s (LSSA’s) Legal Tech survey into the legal profession, shows a small increase in black legal professionals, while a lack of BEE credentials is a worry for smaller legal firms.
-
In this third of a six-part series showcasing champions of the rule of law in Africa, Karim Anjarwalla, Managing Partner of ALN Kenya | Anjarwalla & Khanna (A&K), talks to Craig Sisterson about the unsung heroes in everyday life who uphold and strengthen the rule of law.
-
In the third of a six-part series showcasing champions of the rule of law in Africa, Karim Anjarwalla of ALN talks to Craig Sisterson.
-
In the first of a six-part series, Abidjan-based Jamal Fofana of Asafo & Co. in Côte d'Ivoire talks to Craig Sisterson about educating people on the rule of law concept and thus making an impact on society.
-
In the fourth of a six-part series showcasing champions of the rule of law in Africa, Khrushchev Ekwueme of Olaniwun Ajayi LP talks to Craig Sisterson about lawyers’ roles in supporting the court system.
-
In the second of a six-part series showcasing champions of the rule of law in Africa, Vlad Movshovich of Webber Wentzel talks to Craig Sisterson.
-
In S v Zuma and Another [2022] 1 All SA 533 (KZP), ‘title to prosecute’ - the test in respect of the apprehension of bias in a prosecutor does not apply to a judicial officer. Other grounds apply for a substantive application.
-
In the first of a six-part series showcasing champions of the rule of law in Africa, Jamal Fofana of Asafo & Co. in Côte d'Ivoire talks to Craig Sisterson about educating people on the rule of law concept and thus making an impact on society.
-
In Rohde v S [2022] 1 All SA 504 (WCC) an apprehension or fear of an adverse order is not the basis for recusal, nor were other grounds relied on by the applicant, individually or cumulatively.
-
In Mbhamali v S [2022] 1 All SA 488 (KZD), practice of child marriages does not supersede the laws and the Constitution of the country. The fact that a child might have consented to such an act is no defence.